Securing corporate perimeter is one of the basic measures a company should take to make sure that nothing threatens its workflow. Although many enterprises are not successful at keeping their network intact. Some organisations

• think of safety instruments only after an incident occurs
• are simply not aware of all the risks
• have been using or are going to use services which might expose them to additional risks
• focus their attention on hackers neglecting internal threats
• are worried about compliance violations and forget about other less relevant but by no means less detrimental breaches

And some happen to trip on almost each of the steps. Computer systems of Johannesburg-Lewiston Area Schools were affected by a ransomware. The insurance provider covered the financial damage although the school wasn’t prepared to deal with the issue and the Superintendent appeared to be unaware of basic cyber incidents that might happen to any organisation.

About a month ago a school technology consultant informed the administrator of a problem impeding file opening. The investigation determined that the attack was coming from Germany.

The school doesn’t store employees’ and students’ data on the servers so personal details weren’t compromised. The school network isn’t fully backed up and corporate devices were impacted significantly making staff members bring their own computers and gadgets — a decision fraught with peril.

Some measures were taken after the violation occurred. The school is going to upgrade antiviruses, create a cloud-based storage securing its protection and focusing their concern on being resistant to ransomware attacks. Anyway, using a Google doc system might keep offenders from harming the server but online storages pose some risks which demand as much attention.

Cloud, antivirus, MSSP, interdicting data transfer

As we can see the organisation:

• reacted to the necessity of improving the risk management mechanisms after a violation had occurred
• claimed to be not prepared to the incident not only due to being insufficiently equipped but also due to being simply unaware of what might happen to their servers
• decided to update its antivirus and relocate the information to online storages overlooking such risks as cloud misconfiguration and data leak as well as the fact that antivirus is only one of many ways to fight cyber attacks
• put all the efforts to ensuring perimeter protection from hackers and didn’t think of securing their environment from insider threats

Besides online storage and antivirus, there are tools and technologies which

- protect you from incidents while compromise your confidentiality or undermine strategic risk assessment

MSSP provides you with an experienced staff aware of every detail about recent threats and regulations and using most relevant tools to safeguard your workflow. But third party consultants know little about your corporate culture, your employees and business processes which have been tuned and customized to fit your needs. Opting for MSSP you should keep in mind that you delegate network monitoring to an intermediary who you are not familiar with and that everything is going to be displayed to the service provider bringing your privacy to zero.

Tools interdicting data transfer, preventing information from being printed or uploaded to a flash drive keep sensitive details within the company’s limits but don’t make you more knowledgeable about your corporate environment and staff members’ communication. Behavior risk management includes possibility of seamless monitoring which facilitates in-depth investigation.

- are nearly inefficient when not integrated as a bundle which comprises a comprehensive solution for both external and internal safety

If you implement a one-sided approach to risk management and address only external threat preventive measures you might flatten your security fortification you have been working on to ensure that your company can fight any offender. Internal control systems are indispensable — they allow you to cover any kind of inside violation thus making you prepared to regulate incidents the source of which is within the company’s perimeter. Employee monitoring software increases significance of that shield which took you efforts to defend your organisation from external attacks.

The core issue many organisations have to recognise is that they are healing symptoms instead of trying to cure provoking factors. A breach occurs, a company fixes it, a problem is solved — a common security misconception. Such a short-sighted tactic keeps you exposed to multiple yet undiscovered threats and makes your efforts look like masking whereas they should be about securing. While you are covering a gap there might appear another one which requires mending with the help of a different instrument.

Tools shielding your perimeter from external attacks will not ensure that your data is intact within the corporate network. Access delimitation will not help when information gets lost, stolen or deliberately leaked. Cryptography will make you theft- or lossproof although it doesn’t guarantee the safety of your documents if someone is willing to disclose their details. The most recent automated compliance management software will put you at the needed level of conformity but focusing on preventive measures that allow you to avoid the biggest penalty will make you let your guard down regarding some latent internal threats.